Difference Between Git Merge and Git Merge --no-ff

Posted in

Difference Between Git Merge and Git Merge --no-ff

Aashiya Mittal
Last updated on July 13, 2024

    Today, Git is widely adopted as a version control system. It is used for the efficient management of changes that have been made to the source code of a project. You can track the changes in all the files of a project. Also, Git allows several developers to merge their codes to create a single module. This gives them the flexibility to work on different modules at the same time and create a complex application in smaller chunks. To operate Git and perform various functions, you can use different Git commands. The git merge command is one of the commonly used Git commands . Moreover, this command supports different flags, and one such flag is --no-ff. The basic role of both git merge and git merge --no-ff commands is to combine two or more branches into a single branch. However, they have some noticeable differences that you should know so that you can decide what command you need to use in a particular scenario. But before we discuss the difference between git merge and git merge --no-ff commands, let’s understand what a git merge command does and various aspects of merging.

    What is Git Merge Command?

    The git merge command merges multiple branches into a single (current) branch. The current branch will get updated and become a merging branch, while the target branches will remain unchanged.

    The Process of Merging Branches

    The git merge command's main purpose is to combine several committed sequences into a single branch. The merge command will take two commit pointers that might be the most recent commits in the different branches that are going to be merged. It will then look for the common base commit for both branches. Once it finds the base, the merge command will create a new merge commit. This will combine the changes made by both the merge commit sequences. A merge commit is unique in such a way that it has two parent commits that are merged together. Git will combine the histories of both the branches automatically once the merge commit is done.

    Preparation for the Merge

    If you want to proceed smoothly with the merging process, you need to take care of the following things:

    • Firstly, you need to confirm the Receiving Branch by running the git status command. The command will help you to check if the HEAD is pointing to the right merge-receiving branch. If it is not pointing to the right branch, you can use the git checkout <branch> command to select the correct receiving branch.
    • Before you execute the Git fetch command, you need to fetch the Latest Remote Commits to ensure that you are considering the latest committed branches for both receiving and merging. If you want to pull the latest remote commits, you need to use the git pull command. Also, you need to ensure that you only use the master branch that has the latest updates.

    The Fast Forward Merge and the 3-way Merge Strategies

    A fast-forward merge is the scenario when Git moves the branch pointer to the incoming commit instead of pointing to constructing a merge commit. This commonly happens while carrying out the git pull command without performing any local changes. As all commits become reachable from the target branch through the current branch, the fast-forward will then combine the history of both the branches. You may not merge the branches that are diverged via fast-forward. If there is no linear path to the target branch, then Git combines both the branches using the 3-way merge. It will then use the dedicated commit for merging the histories of both branches. The 3-way merge generates the merge commit having two branch tips and their common parent. In general, the fast-forward merge is used by developers if they want to fix small bugs or add small features. On the other hand, the 3-way merging is reserved for integrating complex features.

    Difference Between git merge and git merge --no-ff

    • Git merge

    Well, if you have worked with git, you must know the importance of the git merge command. It is basically used for merging two branches into a single branch and history. Syntax: git merge <branch> If you are not mentioning any option, then the merge command is the fast-forward merge by default. But the fast-forward merge is only possible to implement if there is a linear path from the current branch tip to the target branch. In this case, Git will merge the histories rather than merging both branches.

    • Git merge --no-ff

    If you want a merge commit during the fast-forward merge, you need to use the git merge with the --no-ff flag. Syntax:

    git merge --no-ff <branch>

    This variation of the git merge command with the --no-ff parameter will merge the specific branches in the current branch. It then carries out the merge commit while performing the fast-forward merge. It will help to keep a record of all the mergers that have been performed.

    No Fast-forward Merge

    Though fast-forward merge is the most commonly used merge, sometimes we just want to prevent the fast-forward merge from happening, especially when we want to maintain a definite branch topology. In that case, we can use the --no-ff parameter along with the git merge command so that it will create a commit merge rather than the fast-forward merge.

    What if the git merge can’t fast-forward?

    Suppose you want to carry out a git merge command especially for a fast-forward merge and somehow need to withdraw. For this, you need to use the git merge only with the -ff parameter.

    Merging More than two Branches

    With the git merge command, you will get to use its variations that will help you in merging more than two branches. You can use any of the following strategies:

    • Octopus

    You can use this strategy for merging the topic branch heads. It is considered to be the default merging strategy if you want to merge or pull more than a single branch. Also, you can use this strategy for resolving problems with more than two heads. You cannot use this strategy for carrying out the complex merge that requires manual resolution.

    • Ours

    By using this strategy, you can resolve any number of heads. The resulting tree will belong to the head of the current branch and it will ignore all the other changes that have been made to other branches. You can use this approach for supplanting the history of the old developments of other side branches.


    The git merge command is one of the commonly used Git commands. It allows you to merge two or more branches into a single branch. This gives developers the flexibility to work on different modules and merge them into a single functionality. The git merge command has several variations that will help you to merge branches differently. Hopefully, this article helped you understand the difference between git merge and git merge --no-ff. Keep in mind that it is important to learn the difference between the two commands so that you can use the right one to meet your specific needs.

    People are also reading:

    Leave a Comment on this Post